Pages

January 16, 2014

Review of Firefox Light, a slimmed down version of Firefox browser

Now-a-days browsers are packed with a lot of new features that help us improve our browsing experience. But because of so many features we have to sacrifice on the performance or memory utilization. I was amazed when I looked at the amount of RAM some of these browsers consume, to have all these features running. I for one don’t use most of these features. I don’t want to sacrifice on performance or stability.

Firefox Light browser

light1 600x319 Review of Firefox Light, a slimmed down version of Firefox browser


I came across this browser with a low foot print, Firefox Light. Well, as the name suggests it’s a third-party, light, stripped-down version of Firefox. Firefox Light has removed lots of features, and is basically a slim down version of the original Firefox. When I initially started using Firefox I loved it because of its low footprint and stability. But over the years with various builds, it has become very slow and bloated, not to mention that the memory consumption has increased drastically.


When it comes to other popular browser like Google Chrome, well it’s the same story, instead of one instance, it creates multiple processes which are supposed to improve the performance, but I have not found any difference.  Chrome creates separate instances because it runs different items in each process. For the browser itself, then for plugins & renders. I had like 25 different processes for Chrome after opening 5 tabs.
But I found that Firefox Light works very well when it comes to usage and memory consumption. According to the developer, he has removed a couple of items like:
  • Crash report
  • Skia Graphic engine
  • WebM
  • Opus Codec
  • WebRTC (enables web browsers with Real-Time Communications capabilities via simple JavaScript APIs)
  • Javascript Debugger
  • GamepadAPI
  • Intl object  for the ECMAScript Internationalization API
  • Web app Sync
  • Health report
  • Firefox Devtools with the Social API
  • DirectShow
  • And a lot more.
For those you can’t get the Flash plugin to work, you need to just copy the NPSWF32.dll to the plugin folder.
  • Close Firefox Light
  • Install the Flash Player and go to the install directory
  • Copy NPSWF32.dll paste it into Light\browser\plugins or to the Profile folder.
I admit that some of these features are used regularly, but for those who don’t, and wish to improve the performance and optimize the memory usage, can give this browser a go. This can co-exist with the full version of Firefox. If you’re going to test you don’t have to remove the existing install of Firefox.

Firefox Light download

To conclude so far I have tested, and it works just fine. I feel like there is a performance boost, and it’s not taking a lot of memory, like the original Firefox does. You can also download and install the add-ons without any problem. The developer offers both 32-bit and 64-bit version. Firefox Light version looks like a good alternative browser and is available here.
Posted by on , in Category Downloads with Tags
Shyam aka “Captain Jack” is a Microsoft MVP and a Windows Enthusiast whose area of expertise is Crash Dump Analysis and Advanced Windows troubleshooting. He has developed Windows based Tools like SF IE Restorator for troubleshooting Internet Explorer issues and SF Diagnostic Tool for collecting Crash dump files for troubleshooting purpose. He blogs at captaindbg.com.

Source: http://www.thewindowsclub.com/review-firefox-light-slimmed-version-firefox-browser?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheWindowsClub+%28The+Windows+Club%29

Related Post

January 7, 2014

Pirate Bay plans web browser to elude censorship


A new browser from The Pirate Bay could make it harder than ever for authorities to block access to its site
Notorious file-sharing site The Pirate Bay has announced plans for a new web browser which it claims will be able to evade attempts by Internet service providers to block access to certain websites – including its own.

The new browser will rely on peer-to-peer (P2P) technology. Since the site data will come from other peers, there is no central IP-address that can be blocked by Internet providers, according to The Pirate Bay. The browser will also run its own 'fake' domain name system. 
 
"The goal is to create a browser-like client to circumvent censorship, including domain blocking, domain confiscation, IP-blocking. This will be accomplished by sharing all of a site's indexed data as P2P downloadable packages, that are then browsed/rendered locally," a Pirate Bay insider told TorrentFreak.

“It’s basically a browser-like app that uses webkit to render pages, BitTorrent to download the content while storing everything locally.”
The new software will be released as a standalone web browser and as a plugin for Mozilla's Firefox and Google's Chrome browsers. The first version is not expected to be released until later in the year, and The Pirate Bay team is still looking for coders to assist with the project.
A growing number of Internet service providers across Europe now block access to The Pirate Bay, following a concerted effort by music and film industry rightsholders to blacklist the site, which facilitates illegal peer-to-peer file sharing using the BitTorrent protocol.

In April 2013, UK Internet providers including Sky, O2, Virgin Media, Everything Everywhere and TalkTalk were ordered to block access to the site, after High Court judge Mr Justice Arnold ruled that the site "sanctions the infringements of copyright committed by its users".

In response to these efforts, The Pirate Bay launched its own PirateBrowser web browser in August 2013, to help users circumvent censorship and blockades. PirateBrowser has reportedly been downloaded more than 2.5 million times since its launch. However, the new browser promises to make The Pirate Bay and other sites more resilient than ever before.

Source:http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/internet/10555307/Pirate-Bay-plans-web-browser-to-elude-censorship.html

January 5, 2014

Chrome 34, Firefox 29, Internet Explorer 11: Memory Use 2014


Firefox uses least amount of memory


memory use

I bench marked the memory use of popular web browsers such as Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox, Microsoft Internet Explorer and Opera back in 2012, and a lot happened since then.
Back then, the Opera browser came first followed by Mozilla Firefox, then Internet Explorer and finally Google Chrome.
All browsers made big progress since then. Firefox jumped by 13 versions, Chrome by 12, Internet Explorer by 2, and Opera switched to Chromium.
Back then, I only looked at the memory use when ten websites were loaded in each browser. This time, I will look at three different scenarios with 5, 15 and 40 open tabs in each browser respectively.
This should cover more real-world scenarios.

Benchmark parameters
  • Test system: Windows 8.1 Professional 64-bit, 8 Gigabytes of RAM.
  • Browsers: Mozilla Firefox 29 Nightly, Google Chrome Dev 34, Internet Explorer 11
  • All browsers without browser extensions, and plug-ins disabled.
  • The 5 websites: ghacks.net, google.com, bing.com, leo.org, lifehacker.com
  • The 15 websites: softpedia.com, microsoft.com, reddit.com, news.ycombinator.com, youtube.com, amazon.com, petmoz.com, donationcoder.com, wordpress.com, ebay.com, and the top 5 websites.
  • The top 40 websites: yandex.ru, paypal.com, apple.com, imdb.com, bbc.co.uk, stackoverflow.com, imgur.com, alibaba.com, netflix.com, cnn.com  godaddy.com, dailymotion.com, dailymail.co.uk, weather.com, wikipedia.com, deviantart.com, huffingtonpost.com, avg.com, mediafire.com, yelp.com, wikihow.com, foxnews.com, theguardian.com, forbes.com, sourceforge.com, plus the top 15 and top 5 websites.

Results

web browser memory use comparison
I made the decision to start with 5 pages, measure the memory use, open another 10, measure again, then the remaining 25 for the last measure.
After that, I decided to close the 25 pages to go down to 15 again, measure that, then close another 10 pages so that I would end up with the top 5, and measure again.
All measurements are taken from Chrome's about:memory page. Note that this, at least in theory, will make Chrome use extra memory as it needs to be displayed by the browser (about 24,000 k it seems)
Update: We have added Chrome 31 Stable and Firefox 26 Stable to the benchmark results:
Five open tabs
  • Google Chrome 34: 258,589 k
  • Firefox 26: 246,288 k
  • Firefox 29: 225,552 k
  • Google Chrome 31: 224,946k
  • Internet Explorer 11: 221989 k
Fifteen open tabs
  • Internet Explorer 11: 550869 k
  • Google Chrome 31: 485,282 k
  • Google Chrome 34: 448,015 k
  • Firefox 26: 332,212 k
  • Firefox 29: 327,060 k
Forty open tabs
  • Internet Explorer 11: 1547254 k
  • Google Chrome 31: 1,255,641 k
  • Google Chrome 34: 1,167,298 k
  • Firefox 29: 779,100 k
  • Firefox 26: 704,128 k
Down to 15 tabs
  • Internet Explorer 11: 595,373 k
  • Google Chrome 31: 526,544 k
  • Google Chrome 34: 514,872 k
  • Firefox 26: 510,116 k
  • Firefox 29: 442654 k
Down to 5 tabs
  • Internet Explorer 11: 377683 k
  • Firefox 26: 371,156 k
  • Firefox 29: 358404 k
  • Google Chrome 31: 263,991
  • Google Chrome 34: 275722 k

Key findings

Microsoft's Internet Explorer 11 performed worst in four of the five benchmarks. It performed best initially with only 5 tabs open in each browser, but landed last in all four consecutive benchmarks.
Google Chrome too made first place only once after nearly all tabs were closed again in all browsers. It seems to release memory faster or more efficiently than Internet Explorer or Firefox.
Firefox takes the crown as a heavy duty browser. It performed best with 15, 40 and down to 15 open tabs and never went above the 1 Gigabyte mark, while the two other browsers did.
In fact, Microsoft's Internet Explorer 11 used about twice as much memory as Firefox with 40 tabs open.
It is interesting to note that Microsoft's web browser recovered memory some time after it went down to only 5 open tabs. A few minutes later, its use dropped down to about 260,000 k of memory usage, while Firefox's usage dropped only by about 40,000 k to 318,816.
Closing Words
Depending on how you use your Internet browser, you may fare well in regards to memory use with each of them. If you have lots of tabs open at all times, then you will benefit from using Firefox the most, as the browser is the most memory efficient when it comes to opening a lot of tabs.
If you open and close tabs regularly, you may want to consider using Google Chrome or even Internet Explorer instead, as they appear to recover memory more quickly than Firefox.
Memory use should not play a big role if you are using a computer with plenty of RAM installed. If you have 4 or more Gigabytes of RAM, then it should not usually be a problem if the browser jumps to 1 or even 1.5 Gigabytes of RAM usage.
If you have less than that though, you may benefit from using a memory efficient browser such as Firefox, instead of Chrome or Internet Explorer.

Souce: http://www.ghacks.net/2014/01/02/chrome-34-firefox-29-internet-explorer-11-memory-use-2014/