5 Reasons Why Firefox is Better than Chrome

Google Chrome is a Google-based web browser that begun towards the end of 2008.

As of August 2015, it is reported that this Chrome browser has a market share of about 56%, making it the most dominant web browser on desktops.

Even though this figure is mind-boggling considering that there are a bunch of other web browsers that include Firefox, Opera and Safari. However, many can agree that this web browser isn’t the best there is. One thing that makes Chrome such a popular web browser is the syncing ability it offers users respective of the number of devices they have. Whether you have several desktops, a bunch of smartphones and even a few tablets with you, all data will be synced as long as you have signed in with the same Google account.

Well, if you are not a fun of this syncing stuff, then there is something much better and designed specifically to meet your browsing needs. Mozilla Firefox is the web browser in question here and if you still doubt this stance, here are five reasons to make you ditch Chrome browser in favor of Firefox web browser.

Chrome is a resource hog

Over the years, Google Chrome has developed into a serious resource hog. Even though this application offers the fastest page rendering, this comes at a cost. A lot of RAMis consumed during this process, and the company has gone to the extent of accepting this, with promises that it will look into this matter and come up with a better browser. The fact that Chrome is a resource hog has some detrimental effects on your PC. Your laptop’s battery life wouldn’t be the best when using Chrome to browse the web.

Extensions are a brainchild of Firefox

There is no doubt that Google Chrome is equipped with dozens of extensions. However, you will find Firefox add-ons that are only exclusive to this browser. One such example is the NoScript extension that is only available for Firefox users.

You will also come across Firefox extensions that allow easy downloading of files, for instance, YouTube videos. However, the same extensions will have trouble working on Chrome web browser as Google doesn’t like them and what they do. Users will have to tweak some security settings to install these extensions.

Firefox offers better privacy than Chrome

If privacy is what you treasure most, then you won’t be a friend of Chrome. Google has all of its eyes set on you, and it will keep track of anything on your account to make sure that the ads targeted to you are the most relevant. This browser will always be asking you to associate the application with a Google ID so that it can sync your data; however, this is a big privacy concern.

There is no such stuff on Firefox and in fact, you will get lots of other browser add-ons that will help in tightening the grip on your privacy settings.

Firefox is easy to use

When compared to Chrome, Firefox is a very easy-to-use web browser. Chrome can become problematic in terms of navigation, especially when lots of tabs are open. Elements will start to grow smaller and smaller with each new tab and in the end, it won’t be possible to know which tab has what information.

There is a side scroll user interface in Firefox browser that helps in easy scrolling using a mouse, something that is not possible on Chrome. You will also come across a separate search box where you can easily search from a variety of search engines such as Bing.

Firefox comes with an inbuilt reader mode

Chrome lacks this one area. While you will this reader mode coming preinstalled in Firefox, Microsoft Edge, and Safari web browsers, the same is not available on this Google-based web browser. In this mode, all ads are removed from the website, and users get a website UI that enables them to view an amazing print-style article.

If reading a lot is your thing, Firefox web browser is the best for your needs.

Source: http://neurogadget.com/2015/08/29/5-reasons-why-firefox-is-better-than-chrome/13777

Tested: How Flash destroys your browser's performance

We tested the effects of browsing with and without Flash on several major browsers. Enabling Flash is, in a word, catastrophic.

In case you needed another reason to uninstall Adobe Flash, we’ve got one: It can drag down your PC by as much as 80 percent. Yes, 80 percent. So not only is Adobe Flash incredibly unsafe, it’s a memory hog. And we’ve got the numbers to prove it.
As part of an upcoming roundup of the major browsers, we tested their abilities to handle Flash. Two browsers, Mozilla Firefox and Opera, do not include Flash, although you can download a plugin from Adobe to enable it. A third, Microsoft’s new Edge browser, enables Flash by default, although you can manually turn it off. Both Internet Explorer 11 and Google’s Chrome also include Flash, which you can disable or adjust within the Settings menu.

The Web’s information superhighway is increasingly littered with ads, popups and worse.

Testing in the real world

Let’s start from the totally naive premise that Flash does not represent a security risk (because it clearly does). Vulnerabilities occur in the background, surreptitiously lifting your data, installing rootkits, and the like. But they don’t impact your day-to-day browsing, right?  Maybe not. But as our tests show, simply using a browser with Flash installed can have major consequences on performance.
As we did in our Windows 10 review, we used a testbed of 30 live sites, ranging from Amazon to The New York Times to iMore to PCMag.com. Most of the sites have embedded ads and trackers, which the sites use to track you, create a profile, and sell you stuff. Because the sites are live, there’s always a possibility that ads and content can change from one visit to the next, but we did our live testing over the course of a single day to minimize this.
We tested Chrome 44, Windows 10’s Edge 12, Firefox 39, Internet Explorer 11, and Opera 31—all the latest versions at press time. We ignored Apple’s Safari browser—sorry, Apple. For Firefox and Opera, we ran our tests without Flash installed, then downloaded the plugin from Adobe’s site. With Edge, we toggled Flash on and off, using its built-in control. We used a Lenovo Yoga 12 notebook with a 2.6GHz Intel Core i7-5600U inside, running a 64-bit copy of Windows 10 Pro on 8GB of memory.
Measuring the impact on your PC's CPU and RAM is somewhat subjective. Loading a page can take as little as a few seconds, for a text-heavy page with few embedded elements. Pages with embedded video, pre-roll advertising, and the like, can take over a minute. We tried to split the difference.

Mark Hachman

You can dig into the Task Manager (WIN + X) to find out what’s chewing up your system resources. All these background processes slow your PC down.

From our list of links, we cut and pasted each link into a new tab, weakly approximating how a user would add one tab, then another. But we did it quickly, to try and stress the browser by throwing a number of elements at it, all at once. After loading all 30 sites, we then waited 30 seconds for things to settle down, before opening Windows 10’s Task Manager and recording the CPU load and memory consumption of both the apps as well as the background processes. If applicable, we added Flash’s CPU and memory load as well. (We snapped a picture of the screen, then copied the values in by hand—a browser like Chrome, for example, has a ton of background processes, all dynamically changing by the second.)
It’s important to note that, especially with a midrange PC, the amount of CPU cycles an app chews through will probably be what causes your PC to stutter and pause—and that’s going to be what frustrates you most.

OMG, Flash

What we found was shocking. 
We condemned Microsoft Edge, for example, for locking up in previous iterations of our 30-tab stress test. With Flash enabled, Edge survived—a testament, perhaps, to a massive bloc of updated code that Microsoft recently released. With Flash enabled, Edge chewed through 4.72GB of memory, sucking down 84.1 percent of my PC’s CPU cycles. With just Word Mobile open, that left my system functional. 

Simply turning on and off Flash can make a significant difference in the amount of resources your browser uses.

But when I toggled Flash off, the same tabs required 4.12GB of memory, and just 24.5 percent of my CPU. That’s an 11-percent drop in memory consumed, and a whopping 61-percent decrease in CPU consumption.
It just got better from there. Opera really surprised me with how efficiently it performed, consuming just 3.47GB of memory with Flash enabled—the lowest of all the browsers we tested. It chewed through 81.2 percent of our CPU. But as a clean install, without Flash, Opera consumed 1.8GB and just 6.6 percent of our CPU cycles. Pages seemed to load like shots from a gun: pow, pow, pow!
Firefox did swimmingly as well, when you removed Flash from the equation. It consumed 1.65GB, and needed only 24.5 percent of the CPU. But after I downloaded Flash, Firefox seemed to throttle itself. The browser never climbed above 29.1 percent of the CPU, but some tabs were unresponsive minutes after loading, and I had to manually check each tab's progress. That was totally unacceptable.
Chrome also consumed 4.23GB of memory, and 71.4 percent of the CPU, with Flash enabled. That was pretty good, just by itself.

For Edge, some redemption

Of all the features that Microsoft highlighted with Edge—its Web Notes, Cortana, the Reading View—the one that jumps out now is its ability to toggle Flash. All the messaging I’ve seen from Microsoft—and the reviews, to boot—have focused on its performance on a few canned benchmarks, rather than real-world browsing. With Flash turned on by default, that performance has been lousy.

Mark Hachman

To toggle Adobe Flash off and on in the Microsoft Edge browser, you need to dive into the Advanced Settings menu.

I can’t say for certain which pages require Flash to be functional, if only because I’ve tolerated Flash for so long. But the toggle at least offers the possibility that Edge can be the modern, streamlined browser that Microsoft hopes it to be.
Edge, however, doesn’t offer a middle ground. Flash is either on, or off. Chrome used to have a “Click to Play” option for Flash, but it seems to have disappeared. In Firefox, you can set Flash in a “click to run” mode: Flash is installed, but it won’t fire unless you manually tell it to. To do this, you’ll need to find Firefox's Add-ons menu, then set the Flash plugin(s) to Ask to Activate.  
(Editor's Note: A number of you are wondering what to do with sites whose content you want to see, but that use Flash. We think that Firefox's "Ask to Activate" feature might be a good compromise: turn it off when you don't need it, and simply click to activate it when you want to watch a video or play a game.)
Ideally, being able to turn Flash on and off on a per-tab basis might be even better, but the Edge team doesn’t seem to have that on the feature roadmap.

How do you turn off Flash?

Here’s a quick guide to removing Flash from your browser:
Microsoft Edge: This is easy. Click the “ellipsis” (...) menu to the upper right, then click Settings > Advanced Settings. Flip the Adobe Flash toggle Off.
Google Chrome: From the menu button in the upper right, click Settings, then scroll down to Show advanced settings. Under Privacy, click Content Settings. Scroll down to Plug-ins > Manage Individual Plugins. You’ll have the option to turn Flash on or off.
Internet Explorer: Click the gearlike Settings icon to the upper right. Scroll down to Manage add-ons. When you’re presented with a list, click Shockwave Flash Object and the Disable button, at the lower right.
Mozilla Firefox: In Firefox, click the menu button at the upper right, click Add-ons, then set the Shockwave Flash plugin to Never Activate.
Opera: This is a bit tricky. To uninstall Flash in Opera, you need to go to Windows 10 Control Panel's Programs > Programs and Features, then manually uninstall Adobe Flash Player PPAPI. (Thanks to HowtoGeek for the tip.)

Stay tuned for our full review

Flash obviously isn’t the only culprit preventing you from browsing efficiently: Javascript, other plugins, ads, and the like all bog down your browser. But as our tests prove, Flash makes a tremendous difference.
In the next few days, we’ll present our full set of benchmark results comparing the top browsers, and how they fare on Windows 10. Each has their own particular set of skills. This message, however, was worth highlighting: Eliminating Flash can make a world of difference in your day-to-day browsing, and is just as important as any benchmark.
Updated at 9:14 AM to address concerns about sites that use Flash.

Source: http://www.pcworld.com/article/2960741/browsers/tested-how-flash-destroys-your-browsers-performance.html

Find the Large Attachments Eating Up Your Gmail Space with a Simple Search

This may come as a surprise, but Google is known for its search capabilities and offers many useful search shortcuts. It's no wonder that Gmail does the same. Network administrator Josh Gilmour points out on his blog that if you're low on space in your Gmail account, one easy way to fix it is to search by message size.

Searching by size is very simple. You just type size: and then the minimum number of you want each message to be. For example, you'd type size:1000000 for messages greater than 1MB. Here are a few more examples, and you can click each link to see the results in your inbox immediately:

• Search for attachments greater than 5MB (size:5000000)
• Search for attachments greater than 25MB (size:25000000)
• Search for attachments greater than 100MB (size:100000000)

Pretty useful for clearing things out.

Source: http://lifehacker.com/5958583/find-the-large-attachments-eating-up-your-gmail-space-with-a-simple-search