Pages

October 6, 2015

Battle of the best browsers: Edge vs. Chrome vs. Firefox vs. Safari vs. Opera vs. IE

The era when Google Chrome was head and shoulders above the competition has ended. Today’s popular browsers compete on a level playing field. Internet Explorer 11 — the oft overlooked Microsoft standby — is being replaced by Edge, a lean browser for Windows 10. Mozilla Firefox and Opera continue to ramp up their version numbers, and Safari tenaciously scuttles along as the under-appreciated byproduct of Apple’s quest for global domination.
You can’t really go wrong with any of the popular browsers, but there are a few things here and there that give each its own competitive edge.



Updated September 8, 2015 by Brendan Hesse: Updated information and benchmark tests in response to Microsoft’s Edge full release, and to account for new versions of the other browsers.



Installation, updates, and compatibility

Installation across the five browsers is basically the same. Users can download them from their respective websites if they aren’t built into your operating system already (i.e. Safari comes preinstalled on Mac OS X, Edge on Windows 10, And IE on all previous versions of Windows), and each will typically download in under 30 seconds depending on your Internet connection.




Below is a list of browser compatibility.



When it comes to updates, Opera, Firefox, and Chrome have the advantage. They install silently, quickly, and transparently download updates in the background and automatically apply the new software when you relaunch the programs. What’s more, the third-party browsers update most frequently, every few weeks, so any major problems are likely to be fixed quicker than with IE and Safari. It’s too soon to say how frequently Microsoft will update Edge.



Users can also manually install updates on Firefox if they would like to have greater control over the browser or prefer to use an older version for whatever reason. Keep in mind that turning off automatic updates is more likely to put your computer at risk, though, since each browser is continuously adding security fixes and other key stability updates.

Design and ease of use

If we didn’t know better, we’d say that the current trend in browser design is for the browser to disappear entirely. IE, Edge, Firefox, Safari, and Chrome all attempt to be as minimal as possible, offering next to no actual text and small, monochromatic buttons that discretely blend with the aesthetic design of operating systems like Windows 8 and Mac OS X. Overall, all five browsers appear to achieve their goals fairly well. Below we compare and contrast browser design.


chrome april update

Google Chrome


Google Chrome: 
Chrome has a lean address bar configuration, stripping everything down into a simple tab layout and address bar configuration that also doubles as a search bar Google calls the “Omnibox.” Like most browsers, the window can get incredibly cramped with 15+ tabs open, but it still does a fantastic job of delivering content whether you have the browser fully expanded or slightly minimized for the sake of space.
Adjacent to the omnibox is Chrome’s simple standard navigational features (i.e. back, forward, refresh, home) by default, but you can easily slim down the window by customizing the toolbar and deleting any buttons you deem pointless. Chrome’s single-click bookmarking method, done by simply clicking the star located on the right side of the address bar, also makes bookmarking your favorite webpages a breeze and hassle-free experience.


firefox april update

Firefox


Mozilla Firefox:
 This browser features a similar, yet more useful layout when compared to its competitors, placing the tab bar above the address bar. Despite reaching version 40 of the software (it skipped versions 18 and 11 through 16, apparently), it still feels like the bulky predecessors of the software, refusing to unite the address and search bars in a single unified field like all of its peers.
However, this is more of an aesthetic issue than a functional one — you can search within the address bar or the accompanying search bar to its right. The browser offers the same kind of single-click bookmarking that Chrome does — all you have to do is click the star located to the right of the search bar — but there isn’t much else that separates it from the rest of the pack. The settings menu is accessible in a similar fashion to that of Google Chrome, allowing you to access various options by clicking a simple button depicting three horizontal bars located in the upper-right corner of the window. Unfortunately, it also takes up a bit of space that could otherwise be used by the tab bar.


ie april update

Internet Explorer 11
Internet Explorer: Technically, IE 11 is the most minimal Internet device of the four, with less “chrome” than Chrome. IE 11 features a single bar that simultaneously functions as the browser’s address and search bar. The space at the top places your open tabs to the right of the address-search bar, making it somewhat more cluttered than some of our other picks given the amount of space the search field takes up, but it typically isn’t worrisome unless you’re really stacking up a high volume of tabs. Other notable design features include the single-click bookmarking star now widely adopted by almost all other prominent browsers.
The two decade old browser is being phased out to make way for Microsoft’s newest browser, Edge. IE is still available in Windows 10, but is not the default and will not receive new features.


Safari 8

Safari 8


Safari: 
 The browser that has traditionally attracted criticism is now a serious competitor to the likes of Google and Firefox. The newest version of Apple’s browser is fairly minimalist in design, but retains enough familiarity for old users of the browser to feel at home. Like its peers, Safari offers the address-search bar hybrid. Updates to Safari 8 include a share icon embedded to the right of the search field. The sharing feature serves as a way to bookmark pages, post to social networks, and share via native Apple platforms (iMessage, Mail). The updated Safari is worth a shot for any OS X users. Mac users running the most recent operating system can even launch the browser in full-screen mode, essentially expanding the window and for the ultimate viewing experience.



opera april update

Opera


Opera: 
This browser embraces Google’s chromium Web engine while retaining signature features that distinguish the browser from the rest. Opera has a single hybrid address-search bar like Chrome, but the alternative browser also sports Opera’s signature features, stash and speed dial. Speed dial allows for easy bookmarking and functions like “the most visited page” on Safari. Stash is similar to Pocket, allowing you to quickly store pages for future browsing. The bottom line, it’s a clean design with innovative features that holds its own against the rest of the competition.



project spartan browser Digital Trends home

Edge


Edge: 
Edge resembles IE 11, though with even smaller borders, fewer icons, and a streamlined toolbar designed to take up more real estate on your display than IE 11. A solitary, address-search bar will also run the width of the page, as well as a trio of headline features that include markups, reading view, and Microsoft’s equivalent to Siri (aka Cortana). It is the standard web browser for Windows 10, and has integration with many of the OS’s features and apps, including Cortana and Outlook.



Benchmark Tests Compared

Most browsers are compatible with Web standards and handle speed with relative ease. A casual user probably won’t notice a difference in the Web page rendering speed between browsers. All five browsers are much faster and leaner than the browsers of a few years ago and become even more so with each new build. Below are our benchmark results for the five browsers, bold text indicates the winner for each category.


Browser
Acid3
SunspiderKraken JavaScriptOctane 2.0HTML5 Compliance
Chrome 45100759.3 ms4366.4 ms9437523/555
Internet Explorer 11100405.4ms7509.2 ms5748348/555
Mozilla Firefox 30100633.5 ms4580.6 ms6554466/555
Safari 8 (Mac only)100144.5 ms3357.5 ms8615400/555
Opera 31100735.5 ms4256.6 ms8638520/555
Edge 100384.6ms4231.3 ms9117397/555


Google Chrome bested the HTML5 compliance benchmark, and the test that indicates how “future-forward” a browser is, as well as Sunspider and Octane 2.0, which measures how your browser will perform under the weighted stress of gaming or highly-interactive webpages.
Chrome was outpaced in two tests; IE, though ranking rather low in the HTML 5 Compliance benchmark test, performed remarkably well in the Kraken JavaScript benchmark, a test that measures rendering time. Safari did very well in the JavaScript-based benchmarks, but not as well in combined and HTML5 benchmarks.
The second of Microsoft’s web browsers, Edge was faster when running the Sunspider benchmark than its older counterpart, and it proved surprisingly efficient in regards to Octane 2.0. Like IE, it stumbled in regards to HTML5 — though, it still scored higher than its predecessor, which seems appropriate.


Extras

Features are what truly separate one browser from the next given that speed and compatibility are no longer really an issue. That being said, each browser does have its own slate of differentiating features, from expansive app stores and add-ons to various extensions and tools, that makes it shine in its own light.
Chrome Web StoreChrome differentiates itself through its constant updates, but also through its extensive Web Apps Store, which offers apps that blur the line between Web and local apps in some unique ways. Much of this philosophy comes from Chrome OS, Google’s desktop operating system based on the Chrome browser. Still, we like the idea and Chrome remains the most integrated software for accessing anything Google related (i.e. Gmail, Google Drive). If Web apps and seamless dashboard features are important to you, check out what Google has to offer.
Check out the mobile versions for Android and iOS devices while you’re at it.
green puzzle piece
Like Chrome, Firefox is on a six-week update schedule, and sports a strong catalog of extensions. Developers will have to retool many of these to support the newest Firefox iteration, but some users refuse to leave Firefox solely because it offers unique extensions that have become essential to their browsing experience. Most other browsers support add-ons, but Firefox may have a lead in mindshare here (for now). The built-in PDF viewer is incredibly handy, as is the browser’s support for Macbook Retina displays and grouped tabs, and Firefox remains the most customizable in terms of interface and display out of the five on our list.
Currently, Firefox only offers a mobile version of its browser for Android devices.
Safari ExtensionsSafari may not have the admirable extension catalog to rival its peers, but it does have offer a good deal of extensions and utilities for productivity and organization. Unlike Firefox and Chrome, though, the third-party extensions are rather bland and aren’t as integrated into the software as they probably could be. The bulk of them also lack the “fun” factor found on other browsers, but hopefully Apple will take a cue from the current market and work more accessible and entertaining extensions into the Safari Extensions Gallery. Other awesome built-in extras include the ad-free Safari Reader, which lets you view solely text without all the unnecessary clutter, and comprehensive iCloud integration for syncing pages across all your devices.
Safari’s mobile version comes preinstalled on iOS devices.
Internet Explorer Add-onsIE11 sports heavy integration and optimization for Windows 7 and 8. Many functions, like turning tabs into new windows, are much easier with Microsoft’s new browser. It retains some of the unique features introduced in IE10, like individual tab previewing from the task bar and a new feature called site pinning, which lets you ‘pin’ a website to the Windows 8 task bar like you would a normal application. However, unlike an ordinary taskbar shortcut, pinned websites can offer customized “right click” menus. For example, pinning the Facebook toolbar will let you right click and auto browse to different sections of the Facebook site like News, Messages, Events and Friends. In addition, when you open a pinned site, the IE11 browser customizes itself to resemble the site you’re viewing. Currently, this only means the icon in the upper-left corner will change along with the colors for the back and forward buttons, but we like the idea.
IE’s mobile version comes preinstalled on Windows devices.
oprea add on 2Creating a browser that can compete with the browser giants is an an uphill battle for Opera. That said, the decision to embed Chromium has proven to pay dividends for the Scandinavian company. Opera’s add-ons library utilizes Chrome’s major apps, including mail and pocket. Thankfully, Opera doesn’t attempt to beat Google at its own game. Sure, the extensive Web-app store offers a variety of mostly-free apps, but Opera’s extensions are centered around the browser’s signature tool, Speed Dial — a touchscreen-optimized homepage. Each extension can be tacked to Opera’s Speed Dial homepage. The simplicity of having your Gmail account stored next to a dependable news aggregatior on your homepage is hard to pass up.
Opera offers mobile versions for Android, iOS, and Windows devices.
spartan extensionsAt this point, Edge doesn’t offer any extensions. However, extensions have proven to be more than just a niche feature given their wide-spread adoption in other browsers. Microsoft has confirmed that Edge will support extensions in one capacity or another, but there’s no word on what exactly that will entail as of yet. However, Edge does offer an attractive an easy to use reader mode, that removes clutter and formatting from web pages and articles to make for comfortable reading on the web.

Security and Privacy

The most valuable tool for secure browsing is user discretion. Every browser has encountered security broaches in the past. And Internet Explorer and Chrome’s reputation for protecting users’ security and privacy credentials is spotty at best.
Chrome, Safari, and Firefox rely on Google’s Safe Browsing API to detect potentially dangerous sites. Thanks to constant updates, Mozilla, Chrome, and Opera all make constant security updates. But Chrome takes security a bit further by also scanning for potentially harmful downloads. There’s also encryption ad-ons currently in the works at Google.
All browsers offer a private session option, too. Private sessions prevent the storage of history, temporary Internet files, and cookies. For example, Internet Explorer 11 features a security measure called Do Not Track. Only Internet Explorer goes so far as to to block trackers completely from communicating with your browser. What’s more, according to a 2013 NSS study, only Internet Explorer blocks trackers used on more than 90 percent of potentially hazardous sites.
Nonetheless, Microsoft has stated that Edge won’t offer IE’s Do Not Track feature, though you will be able to enable some tracking protection. This change of heart is because Do Not Track isn’t honored by many websites, including Facebook and Google.

Popularity

Correct Stat
According to the latest numbers from StatCounter, Chrome was the top browser for March 2015, garnering nearly 50 percent of the global browser market share and further solidifying its spot as top dog. IE and Firefox continue to be popular, holding roughly 18.06 and 17.96 percent, respectively, but both seem to be leveling out. Safari and Opera round off the top five, fixed at around 10 percent and 1.7 percent, respectively. On the mobile side, Chrome wins out with a staggering 31.52 percent, but Opera’s touch-screen optimized browser holds an impressive mobile browser market share at 8.4 percent. Mobile incarnations of Safari and IE jostle for supremacy with significantly lower shares. Edge is too new to be on the list.


Which browser is best?



For now, Chrome remains the best browser on the market. Google’s proprietary browser boasts the largest and most useful selection of apps and extensions, along with a frequent update schedule.
Other browsers, however, are upping their game. Opera and Firefox now offer a similar update frequency and IE 11 outperforms Chrome on Sunspider’s benchmark standards. Then there’s Spartan, which could become a contender when Windows 10 is released.
The bottom line is this, we’re in an era where the most minimal and modular browser reigns supreme. Chrome remains the most nimble and most app-ready browsing experience. IE/Spartan, Firefox, and Opera have narrowed their lead significantly, each offering new features to better accommodate the needs of some users.


Update April 13, 2015 by Joe Donovan: 
Updated article to reflect the most recent versions of each browser, with the inclusion of Microsoft’s Edge.
This article was originally published on March 31, 2013.


Read more: http://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/best-browser-internet-explorer-vs-chrome-vs-firefox-vs-safari-vs-edge/#ixzz3no2lCKna
Follow us: @digitaltrends on Twitter | digitaltrendsftw on Facebook

Opera Browser Review



Pros
Opera boasts cutting-edge multimodal features and competitive navigation speeds.

Cons
The browser is missing helpful features such as parental controls, and it has compatibility issues with some sites.

The Verdict: 9.3/10Despite some compatibility conflicts, Opera is a secure, fast and feature-rich internet browser worthy of your consideration.



Having started back in 1995, Opera stands as the second-oldest web browser currently in use. This software runs on a Google Chromium system. It is compatible across every platform and device. Opera is not the most popular desktop or mobile browser out there, but we were impressed with its features and security options, and found it to be one of the top internet browsers in its own right. Opera is the Top Ten Reviews Bronze Award winner for the best internet browsers.

Opera's multimodal interaction is just one of its many cutting-edge features. The browser also boasts competitive launch and page load times and comprehensive user support. Such well-rounded capabilities would make Opera a first-rate internet browser, if not for some hindering compatibility issues.

Like most internet browsers, Opera claims to be the fastest browser available, and on most accounts it delivers highly competitive speeds. Opera took 2.2 seconds to boot up our site initially. Over 10 cold startups, the time decreased to an average of 1.8 seconds. The time it took to visit another site was 3.3 seconds. That impressive time beat out most of its competitors.

Browser speed doesn't matter much if the browser is difficult to navigate. The latest version of Opera delivers a refined user interface, boasting a clean, featherweight design that emphasizes the content and not the browser. It may take you a bit of time to learn how to take advantage of the browser's full capabilities, but overall, Opera is intuitive and easy to use once you become familiar with how it works.

The compatibility of Opera across the net takes a hit based on each site's browser sniffing. Much of the internet is outdated and "sniffs" for particular browsers in an attempt to format the site for the browser. Because these sites are outdated, they may still block Opera entirely.

Features
Compare
9.2/10


Opera is known for debuting original browsing features that later become standard on most internet browsers, including tabbed browsing and built-in search. Opera continues to stay ahead of the curve with a new integrated mail client, one-click bookmarking and tab stacks. That third feature is a tab-grouping mechanism that allows you to stack related tabs vertically rather than horizontally.

Opera delivers versatile multi-modal interaction. For instance, it is possible to control virtually every aspect of the browser with a keyboard. You can use voice commands to navigate the web and even have the browser read text to you. Opera also supports mouse gestures, which are similar to keyboard shortcuts but use the mouse. These features alone make Opera a more accessible browser for a wider range of users than many of its competitors.

Opera is robust in terms of features, and is noticeably lacking only one feature that we looked for in internet browsers: parental controls. They aren't a necessity, but the inclusion of the controls would make the browser more apt for family households.

Security
Compare
10/10


Opera has security features that check websites for malware and phishing schemes. The browser also uses advanced encryption when you visit a secure website and provides the option of erasing all private data, such as browsing history and cookies. This is convenient if you are browsing on a shared computer.

The internet browser allows you to customize your security settings. For example, you can turn off the option to have the browser check each site you visit for security threats, even though doing so can leave your system vulnerable.

Help & Support
Compare
10/10
You can purchase a premium support package that comes with email support. However, there is enough online information that you probably won't need the supplementary support. Online you find tutorials, FAQs and a knowledgebase. Opera's web forums are also a valuable resource; in addition to submitting bugs and known issues, you can ask questions and interact with other users.

Opera Summary: 9.3/10
Opera's compatibility issues are likely to be the deciding factor for many prospective users, but more and more websites become compatible with the browser each day. Moreover, while Opera does not have the firm backing of a major corporation like our other top-ranked internet browsers, it manages to stay on par with the competition with its robust feature set, advanced security protocols and rapid speeds.

Source: http://internet-browser-review.toptenreviews.com/opera-review.html


September 11, 2015

Firefox is About to Become an Almost Complete Copy of Chrome

Mozilla Firefox is due for some big changes soon. By the end of 2015, Firefox will move to a more Chrome-like multi-process design. And, in a year to a year and a half, Firefox will abandon its current add-on system for one largely compatible with Chrome extensions.
These aren’t necessarily bad changes — in fact, they’re arguably big improvements. But Firefox seems to be abandoning its big advantage and becoming even more Chrome-like. The list of reasons to use Firefox over Chrome is shrinking.



A Multi-Process, Sandboxed Firefox is Almost Here

Firefox currently stands alone as the only single-process web browser. Chrome was multi-process when it launched, and other browsers like Internet Explorer, Microsoft Edge, Apple Safari, and Opera are all multi-process browsers now.
Actually, Firefox isn’t really single process anymore — it has a special plugin-container process it uses to isolate the Flash plug-in and other browser plug-ins from the rest of the browser. But, if you have an eight-core CPU and load eight web pages, they won’t run on eight cores — they’ll just run on a single one.


Mozilla has had an on-again, off-again project to fix this named Electrolysis. The project was halted in 2011 because it was too hard, but it was restarted years later. Thankfully, it’s almost here. Multi-process Firefox is on by default in the current nightly builds of Firefox and will be rolled out to everyone in mid-December 2015, according to Mozilla. This means

Firefox will finally perform better on multi-core CPUs when rendering multiple web pages.
As another bonus, security sandboxing will arrive along with Electrolysis. This is another long-awaited feature other browsers — yes, including Internet Explorer — have had for years. Firefox is currently the only web browser not making use of sandboxing technologies to limit the damage browser exploits can do. This has had real impacts in the real world — witness the recent malvertising attack that used a zero-day in Firefox to compromise Windows, Mac, and Linux users on a Russian website. Sandboxing likely would have prevented this, or at least would have required the attackers exploit a separate flaw in the sandbox as well.



 

 

WebExtensions Will Replace Firefox’s Powerful Extension Framework

Mozilla recently announced its intention to kill the current Firefox extension framework and replace it with something new. The new framework, named WebExtensions, is “largely compatible with the model used by Chrome and Opera.” Microsoft Edge is about to gain an extension framework that will also be largely compatible with Chrome’s extension framework — everyone but Apple seems to be jumping on this bandwagon and incorporating Chrome-like extensions.


Current XUL and XPCOM extensions will be deprecated and removed entirely within a year and a half. Those powerful add-ons you’re using in Firefox today? They’ll be gone at some point in the near future, replaced with add-ons much more like Chrome’s.
Now, this isn’t the end of the world. Mozilla wants to extend the Chrome extensions framework to add features to make extensions like NoScript possible and add sidebar support like the sidebar support in Opera. Mozilla wants to ensure current popular extensions can continue to work in the FIrefox of the future, and is working on making that happen.


And, what’s more, this is good news. Firefox’s powerful extension framework has led to a lot of teething problems, particularly when Mozilla jumped on board a Chrome-like rapid release cycle. It’s about to cause a lot more problems, as many extensions will need to be updated to support multi-process Firefox or they won’t work properly. Future projects like Servo — a new layout engine to perhaps one day replace Gecko — wouldn’t be compatible with the old extension system, either. And there should be an improvement in security, as extensions can be sandboxed a bit more and don’t all have access to everything.
But this rightly rubs some people the wrong way. Firefox’s extension system is about to become less powerful. Currently, browser extensions can do practically anything in Firefox. That leads to security problems, compatibility issues, and breakages during development. But it’s also Firefox’s big advantage — Firefox is the browser with the most powerful add-on framework, bar none. That’s about to no longer be true. Mozilla will add features to allow the most popular add-ons to continue to function, but less-used add-ons and future add-ons will be much more restricted in what they can do.


If Firefox no longer has the most powerful add-on framework, its biggest advantage over its competitors will be gone.



 

 

Firefox Has Been Following in Chrome’s Footsteps for Years

Of course, Firefox has been following in Chrome’s footsteps for a long time now. Shortly after Chrome launched, Mozilla jumped on-board a rapid release cycle that sees regular releases of Firefox every six weeks. This caused a lot of problems with broken add-ons because Firefox’s add-on framework was never designed for this.
Last year, Firefox received a new theme named Australis designed to be more “modern.” Many users considered this much more Chrome-like and balked at it. Firefox has also dumped the status bar, as Chrome did.


Other features have become increasingly Chrome-like, too. Firefox Sync was redesigned to use just a username and password instead of the old security key system — just like Chrome. You can now have both normal browsing and private browsing windows at once, like in Chrome. Mozilla has started packing in questionable features like Firefox Hello and Pocket integration, just as Google has built its own features into Chrome. Firefox can now play H.264 videos on the web, as other browsers can.


Mozilla is also only going to allow Mozilla-signed add-ons on the stable version of Firefox, requiring users switch to a developer version to install ones Mozilla hasn’t approved. Chrome is also limiting these for security reasons.


And Mozilla is about to come out with Firefox for iOS — a browser for iPhone and iPad that provides a different skin around Apple’s Safari renderer but allows you to sync with your Firefox account. Chrome for iOS works similarly, but Mozilla avoided doing this for years because they couldn’t use their own Gecko rendering engine.



 

 

Firefox Needs a Distinct Identity

Now, don’t get us wrong: Most of these changes are good. Even the most controversial ones like getting rid of the extension framework will probably be an improvement in the long run.
But there’s no doubt that Firefox is gradually losing its distinct identity. Abandoning the most powerful extension framework for an add-on model largely compatible with Chrome’s will be a huge blow to a vocal part of Firefox’s user base.
Mozilla has to answer an important question: Why use Firefox over Chrome? Mozilla would probably argue that Firefox is unique because it’s made by a non-profit company dedicated to making the web better, rather than big for-profit corporations that do more things like its competitors. It also uses Gecko, a different rendering engine, which hopefully helps preserve web standards through a variety of implementations. But is that really enough?

Firefox is now using Yahoo as its default search engine, and that certainly isn’t a big advantage. Go ahead — search “vlc” on Google, Bing, and Yahoo right now. Google will show you a big VLC download link without any misleading ads, Bing will show you some dangerously misleading ads but still point you toward the VLC download page, and Yahoo will show you a bunch of ads trying to get you to download malware without a clear indication of where you can get VLC. Firefox has the worst default search engine of any mainstream browser, and Mozilla certainly isn’t helping users by going with Yahoo.

Source: http://www.howtogeek.com/228131/firefox-is-about-to-become-an-almost-complete-copy-of-chrome/

September 2, 2015

The best 7 secure browsers 2015

All browsers claim to be secure these days, so is there any point in using one that majors on its security?



Browse the web with privacy and security with these best secure browsers. Protect your privacy online with the five best secure browsers you can use in 2015.


What does the idea of a secure browser mean in 2015? The world is now more complex than it was in 2010 when we last looked at the contenders. People are more oriented to mobile devices running under very different conditions while a range of security features such as URL filtering, download protection and do not track have transformed mainstream desktop browsers such as Chrome, IE and Firefox. In a sense all browsers could now plausibly claim to be ‘secure’ browsers.



If that’s the case, what has happened to what were once considered secure browsers? One answer is the specialised products are now more focused on the issue of user privacy, of handing back control to the user and opting out of data collection systems of the sort that underpin firms such as Google.


It is perfectly possible to tweak Chrome, Firefox or IE, fine tuning them for security and privacy if that’s important. Each now has a privacy mode – which might or might not convince the sceptic of course. But the philosophy behind the true secure browser is to eschew the notion of platforms and plug-ins, stripping back every non-essential feature to create a more minimalist experience.


The following five (OK, plus one plug-in) achieve this is in different ways. This list is not intended to be exhaustive, merely an indication of what’s on offer from ones that caught our eye. Privacy usually requires compromises so they won't be for everyone.


Best Secure Browser: Epic privacy browser





Based on Chromium, Epic is the perfect example of a browser that strips out every conceivable feature to maximise privacy. It’s rather like using a minimalist Google Chrome with the Google. Cookies and trackers are eliminated after each session, all searches  are proxied through the firm’s own servers (which means there is no way to connect an IP address to a search), and it attempt to  prioritise SSL connections wherever possible., useful for open Wi-Fi connections. It does not collect data about its users and comes with excellent built-in ad blocking.


For a fully-encrypted connection, it includes a one-button proxying feature that does slow down browsing but will appeal to some users (it can’t necessarily be used as a regional bypass proxy because Epic’s servers are based in the US). Despite eschewing plug-ins a handful are available to make life a bit easier, for example password manager LastPass.
Downsides? Epic doesn’t seem to include the malware or anti-phishing protection now found on popular browsers.


Best Secure Browser: Comodo Dragon/Ice Dragon




Comodo has continued to improve its Dragon secure browser, forking it into two version based on Chromium (Dragon) and Firefox (Ice Dragon), sort of remixed versions of the standard browsers that add features while removing some potentially undesirable ones. Which one you choose would depend on your current investment in either Chrome or Firefox because each aims to maintain compatibility with thing like plug-ins, stored passwords, and favourites if desired.
Features? Probably the first one is the ability to choose whether to use Comodo’s SecureDNS servers for either Dragon or all applications (or not at all), which potentially offers privacy and security compared to a user wanting to bypass their ISP’s infrastructure.  This incorporates a domain filtering system designed to limit exposure to problem domains of the sort used by malware     


Probably the most intriguing feature is the browser’s ‘virtualised mode that isolates it from the host system. This is a free feature but requires the user to install Comodo Internet Security (CIS), a free version of the company’s anti-virus software. Not everyone will want to do that but the added security of this approach is worth considering.
Comodo also includes SiteInspector, a system for filtering suspect URLs as they are accessed.


Downsides? Comodo is set up as a parallel world to Chrome or Firefox minus some of the tracking and with some extra added layers of security. Impressive as this sounds it’s almost the polar opposite of Epic’s minimalism - worth experimenting with perhaps.
We should also mention that the recent controversy that engulfed Comodo over its promotion of tools such as PrivDog does not, according to the company, affect Dragon.
‘Chromodo’
Comodo also now offers something called Chromodo. As far as we can tell it is identical to Dragon but with a more standard (i.e. non-Comodo branded) look and feel.

Best Secure Browser: Tor





The Tor browser has become the watchword for the anti-surveillance because it is built on an entire infrastructure of ‘hidden’ relay servers. Built atop a modified Firefox, it can be installed on a Windows, Mac or Linux PC but also on a USB stick if that’s preferable.
The important thing to remember about Tor is that it is really an advanced privacy browser rather than a secure one in that it includes no anti-malware technology and blocks plug-ins by design. It is designed to anonymise a user within certain constraints such as the requirement to use only HTTPS connections (enforced by HTTPS Everywhere – see entry below).  The Tor Project offers a list of do and don’t for using it securely, including being very careful about downloading and opening documents which require external applications. Tor is a privacy browser not a secure environment.
Downsides? Using Tor will be slower than with other browsers and it can be demanding to use to its full privacy potential.  Some people think that anyone who uses Tor is trying to hide something. Of course they are right. If privacy is that important, let them think what they want.


Hornet


As an aside, in 2015 a system called Hornet was proposed fir the future that would speed up Tor’s Onion routing by minimising the system’s network overhead. Today, Tor browsing is slower than conventional browsing but this might not always be the case.



Best Secure Browser: Dooble





Dooble is a lean Chromium-based multi-platform (Windows, Linux, OS X) browser that won’t be for everyone despite its privacy features. In its default state it disables insecure interfaces such as Flash and Javascript which will make it difficult to use with a lot of sites but might be worth it for its stripped-down approach. The browser assumes the user wants to travel incognito from the off, while HTTPS can be enforced and third-party session cookies in iFrames blocked. The handling of cookies is unusually granular.
An innovative feature is that all user content (bookmarks, browsing preferences and history) can be encrypted using various ciphers and a passphrase. Another interesting feature is to set privacy, for example private browsing, for each tab using the right-click option.
Reviewers haven’t taken to Dooble because it lacks refinement in places but we found it fast and in some of its ideas clever.
Downsides? As stated.


Best Secure Browser: Maxthon Cloud Browser




Maxthon is not so much a secure browser as a totally new type of HTML5-compatible browser that wants to act as a straight replacement.  With origins in China, and designed around synchronisation between PC and mobile and builds in features often enabled in other browsers using plug-ins.
Although not a security browser per se, it embeds claimed protection from AdBlock Plus including the (for some) contentious ‘Acceptable Ads’ technology,  AES256 encrypted synchronisation  of files to its cloud services, and says it limits employee access at its end to customer data. That probably gives most people the collywobbles but it’s worth pointing out that exactly the same issues exist for any cloud service, including Google.
Downsides? Despite the interesting aspect of cloud integration we couldn’t see how Maxthon was inherently more secure than running a branded browser with the security settings turned up. In places poorly explained and documented, it’s also unclear whether it has features such as download protection that would come as standard elsewhere.


Best Secure Browser: HTTPS Everywhere

A browser plug-in rather than a browser as such, HTTPS Everywhere is an EFF/Tor project that enforces SSL security wherever that’s possible in Chrome, Firefox and Opera. Its promise is to make what would otherwise be a complex and uncertain process much simpler because it is easy to start out using HTTPS on a website and be sent back to non-HTTPS pages without realising it.
Downsides? It’s another plug-on of course but it’s worth it. A boon for café surfers everywhere.

Best Secure Browser: Cocoon browsing


When we first looked at Cocoon in 2014 we were put off by the fact that it didn’t seem to have been much recommended since its first appearance around 2011-2012. More recently the firm seems to have re-launched itself as an ad-supported free product (a more advanced Cocoon+ is ad-free but costs $19.99 per annum) as a “military-grade” product offering a range of alluring security features –anonymous browsing, anti-Facebook tracking, better W-Fi security on open hotspots, and an encrypted end-to-end connection.
Based on a plug-in design (Firefox, Chrome, Safari and IE), Cocoon is really a proxy VPN-like service in which the user logs into its server using a created account, and logs out after conducting any browsing. In theory, this makes it ideal when using unsecured PCs away from home.
We have yet to properly test the browser’s security for this review (that is imminent) but the paid version does advertise some interesting additional features such as ‘mailslots’, basically disposable email addresses that hide the real address (webmail services also offer this through aliases although the underlying service such as Gmail or Yahoo is always apparent). Deleting the temporary email address effectively unsubscribes you from anything signed up for.


Best Secure Browser: IceBrowser (Cocoon)




Based on the Cocoon platform, Icebrowser is a Firefox-only plug-in that offers exactly the same security features as Cocoon but routes traffic via servers in Iceland. The advantage? Browsing data is logged in that country, far from the prying eyes of the NSA and others, or at least we assume that’s the benefit.
Using the service requires the user to sign up to the possibility of a $9.95 per annum charge on the basis of the following:
“You will not be charged at this time. Providing your billing information ensures your service will continue uninterrupted at the end of your free trial and limits one free trial per person to avoid fraud.” Make of that what you will.

Source: http://www.techworld.com/security/best-7-secure-browsers-2015-3246550/3/



August 29, 2015

5 Reasons Why Firefox is Better than Chrome

Google Chrome is a Google-based web browser that begun towards the end of 2008.
As of August 2015, it is reported that this Chrome browser has a market share of about 56%, making it the most dominant web browser on desktops.
Even though this figure is mind-boggling considering that there are a bunch of other web browsers that include Firefox, Opera and Safari. However, many can agree that this web browser isn’t the best there is. One thing that makes Chrome such a popular web browser is the syncing ability it offers users respective of the number of devices they have. Whether you have several desktops, a bunch of smartphones and even a few tablets with you, all data will be synced as long as you have signed in with the same Google account.
Well, if you are not a fun of this syncing stuff, then there is something much better and designed specifically to meet your browsing needs. Mozilla Firefox is the web browser in question here and if you still doubt this stance, here are five reasons to make you ditch Chrome browser in favor of Firefox web browser.
Chrome is a resource hog
Over the years, Google Chrome has developed into a serious resource hog. Even though this application offers the fastest page rendering, this comes at a cost. A lot of RAMis consumed during this process, and the company has gone to the extent of accepting this, with promises that it will look into this matter and come up with a better browser. The fact that Chrome is a resource hog has some detrimental effects on your PC. Your laptop’s battery life wouldn’t be the best when using Chrome to browse the web.
Extensions are a brainchild of Firefox
There is no doubt that Google Chrome is equipped with dozens of extensions. However, you will find Firefox add-ons that are only exclusive to this browser. One such example is the NoScript extension that is only available for Firefox users.
You will also come across Firefox extensions that allow easy downloading of files, for instance, YouTube videos. However, the same extensions will have trouble working on Chrome web browser as Google doesn’t like them and what they do. Users will have to tweak some security settings to install these extensions.
Firefox offers better privacy than Chrome
If privacy is what you treasure most, then you won’t be a friend of Chrome. Google has all of its eyes set on you, and it will keep track of anything on your account to make sure that the ads targeted to you are the most relevant. This browser will always be asking you to associate the application with a Google ID so that it can sync your data; however, this is a big privacy concern.
There is no such stuff on Firefox and in fact, you will get lots of other browser add-ons that will help in tightening the grip on your privacy settings.
Firefox is easy to use
When compared to Chrome, Firefox is a very easy-to-use web browser. Chrome can become problematic in terms of navigation, especially when lots of tabs are open. Elements will start to grow smaller and smaller with each new tab and in the end, it won’t be possible to know which tab has what information.
There is a side scroll user interface in Firefox browser that helps in easy scrolling using a mouse, something that is not possible on Chrome. You will also come across a separate search box where you can easily search from a variety of search engines such as Bing.
Firefox comes with an inbuilt reader mode
Chrome lacks this one area. While you will this reader mode coming preinstalled in Firefox, Microsoft Edge, and Safari web browsers, the same is not available on this Google-based web browser. In this mode, all ads are removed from the website, and users get a website UI that enables them to view an amazing print-style article.
If reading a lot is your thing, Firefox web browser is the best for your needs.

Source: http://neurogadget.com/2015/08/29/5-reasons-why-firefox-is-better-than-chrome/13777

August 11, 2015

Tested: How Flash destroys your browser's performance

We tested the effects of browsing with and without Flash on several major browsers. Enabling Flash is, in a word, catastrophic.


In case you needed another reason to uninstall Adobe Flash, we’ve got one: It can drag down your PC by as much as 80 percent. Yes, 80 percent. So not only is Adobe Flash incredibly unsafe, it’s a memory hog. And we’ve got the numbers to prove it.
As part of an upcoming roundup of the major browsers, we tested their abilities to handle Flash. Two browsers, Mozilla Firefox and Opera, do not include Flash, although you can download a plugin from Adobe to enable it. A third, Microsoft’s new Edge browser, enables Flash by default, although you can manually turn it off. Both Internet Explorer 11 and Google’s Chrome also include Flash, which you can disable or adjust within the Settings menu.
sfgate webpage
The Web’s information superhighway is increasingly littered with ads, popups and worse.

Testing in the real world

Let’s start from the totally naive premise that Flash does not represent a security risk (because it clearly does). Vulnerabilities occur in the background, surreptitiously lifting your data, installing rootkits, and the like. But they don’t impact your day-to-day browsing, right?  Maybe not. But as our tests show, simply using a browser with Flash installed can have major consequences on performance.
As we did in our Windows 10 review, we used a testbed of 30 live sites, ranging from Amazon to The New York Times to iMore to PCMag.com. Most of the sites have embedded ads and trackers, which the sites use to track you, create a profile, and sell you stuff. Because the sites are live, there’s always a possibility that ads and content can change from one visit to the next, but we did our live testing over the course of a single day to minimize this.
We tested Chrome 44, Windows 10’s Edge 12, Firefox 39, Internet Explorer 11, and Opera 31—all the latest versions at press time. We ignored Apple’s Safari browser—sorry, Apple. For Firefox and Opera, we ran our tests without Flash installed, then downloaded the plugin from Adobe’s site. With Edge, we toggled Flash on and off, using its built-in control. We used a Lenovo Yoga 12 notebook with a 2.6GHz Intel Core i7-5600U inside, running a 64-bit copy of Windows 10 Pro on 8GB of memory.
Measuring the impact on your PC's CPU and RAM is somewhat subjective. Loading a page can take as little as a few seconds, for a text-heavy page with few embedded elements. Pages with embedded video, pre-roll advertising, and the like, can take over a minute. We tried to split the difference.
Microsoft edge background processes Mark Hachman
You can dig into the Task Manager (WIN + X) to find out what’s chewing up your system resources. All these background processes slow your PC down.
From our list of links, we cut and pasted each link into a new tab, weakly approximating how a user would add one tab, then another. But we did it quickly, to try and stress the browser by throwing a number of elements at it, all at once. After loading all 30 sites, we then waited 30 seconds for things to settle down, before opening Windows 10’s Task Manager and recording the CPU load and memory consumption of both the apps as well as the background processes. If applicable, we added Flash’s CPU and memory load as well. (We snapped a picture of the screen, then copied the values in by hand—a browser like Chrome, for example, has a ton of background processes, all dynamically changing by the second.)
It’s important to note that, especially with a midrange PC, the amount of CPU cycles an app chews through will probably be what causes your PC to stutter and pause—and that’s going to be what frustrates you most.

OMG, Flash

What we found was shocking. 
We condemned Microsoft Edge, for example, for locking up in previous iterations of our 30-tab stress test. With Flash enabled, Edge survived—a testament, perhaps, to a massive bloc of updated code that Microsoft recently released. With Flash enabled, Edge chewed through 4.72GB of memory, sucking down 84.1 percent of my PC’s CPU cycles. With just Word Mobile open, that left my system functional. 
flash benchmarks
Simply turning on and off Flash can make a significant difference in the amount of resources your browser uses.
But when I toggled Flash off, the same tabs required 4.12GB of memory, and just 24.5 percent of my CPU. That’s an 11-percent drop in memory consumed, and a whopping 61-percent decrease in CPU consumption.
It just got better from there. Opera really surprised me with how efficiently it performed, consuming just 3.47GB of memory with Flash enabled—the lowest of all the browsers we tested. It chewed through 81.2 percent of our CPU. But as a clean install, without Flash, Opera consumed 1.8GB and just 6.6 percent of our CPU cycles. Pages seemed to load like shots from a gun: pow, pow, pow!
Firefox did swimmingly as well, when you removed Flash from the equation. It consumed 1.65GB, and needed only 24.5 percent of the CPU. But after I downloaded Flash, Firefox seemed to throttle itself. The browser never climbed above 29.1 percent of the CPU, but some tabs were unresponsive minutes after loading, and I had to manually check each tab's progress. That was totally unacceptable.
Chrome also consumed 4.23GB of memory, and 71.4 percent of the CPU, with Flash enabled. That was pretty good, just by itself.

For Edge, some redemption

Of all the features that Microsoft highlighted with Edge—its Web Notes, Cortana, the Reading View—the one that jumps out now is its ability to toggle Flash. All the messaging I’ve seen from Microsoft—and the reviews, to boot—have focused on its performance on a few canned benchmarks, rather than real-world browsing. With Flash turned on by default, that performance has been lousy.
microsoft edge adobe flash Mark Hachman
To toggle Adobe Flash off and on in the Microsoft Edge browser, you need to dive into the Advanced Settings menu.
I can’t say for certain which pages require Flash to be functional, if only because I’ve tolerated Flash for so long. But the toggle at least offers the possibility that Edge can be the modern, streamlined browser that Microsoft hopes it to be.
Edge, however, doesn’t offer a middle ground. Flash is either on, or off. Chrome used to have a “Click to Play” option for Flash, but it seems to have disappeared. In Firefox, you can set Flash in a “click to run” mode: Flash is installed, but it won’t fire unless you manually tell it to. To do this, you’ll need to find Firefox's Add-ons menu, then set the Flash plugin(s) to Ask to Activate.  
(Editor's Note: A number of you are wondering what to do with sites whose content you want to see, but that use Flash. We think that Firefox's "Ask to Activate" feature might be a good compromise: turn it off when you don't need it, and simply click to activate it when you want to watch a video or play a game.)
Ideally, being able to turn Flash on and off on a per-tab basis might be even better, but the Edge team doesn’t seem to have that on the feature roadmap.

How do you turn off Flash?

Here’s a quick guide to removing Flash from your browser:
Microsoft Edge: This is easy. Click the “ellipsis” (...) menu to the upper right, then click Settings > Advanced Settings. Flip the Adobe Flash toggle Off.
Google Chrome: From the menu button in the upper right, click Settings, then scroll down to Show advanced settings. Under Privacy, click Content Settings. Scroll down to Plug-ins > Manage Individual Plugins. You’ll have the option to turn Flash on or off.
Internet Explorer: Click the gearlike Settings icon to the upper right. Scroll down to Manage add-ons. When you’re presented with a list, click Shockwave Flash Object and the Disable button, at the lower right.
Mozilla Firefox: In Firefox, click the menu button at the upper right, click Add-ons, then set the Shockwave Flash plugin to Never Activate.
Opera: This is a bit tricky. To uninstall Flash in Opera, you need to go to Windows 10 Control Panel's Programs > Programs and Features, then manually uninstall Adobe Flash Player PPAPI. (Thanks to HowtoGeek for the tip.)

Stay tuned for our full review

Flash obviously isn’t the only culprit preventing you from browsing efficiently: Javascript, other plugins, ads, and the like all bog down your browser. But as our tests prove, Flash makes a tremendous difference.
In the next few days, we’ll present our full set of benchmark results comparing the top browsers, and how they fare on Windows 10. Each has their own particular set of skills. This message, however, was worth highlighting: Eliminating Flash can make a world of difference in your day-to-day browsing, and is just as important as any benchmark.
Updated at 9:14 AM to address concerns about sites that use Flash.

Source: http://www.pcworld.com/article/2960741/browsers/tested-how-flash-destroys-your-browsers-performance.html

August 5, 2015

Find the Large Attachments Eating Up Your Gmail Space with a Simple Search


This may come as a surprise, but Google is known for its search capabilities and offers many useful search shortcuts. It's no wonder that Gmail does the same. Network administrator Josh Gilmour points out on his blog that if you're low on space in your Gmail account, one easy way to fix it is to search by message size.
Searching by size is very simple. You just type size: and then the minimum number of you want each message to be. For example, you'd type size:1000000 for messages greater than 1MB. Here are a few more examples, and you can click each link to see the results in your inbox immediately: